すべて

Everything — Grokipedia Fact-checked by Grok 3 months ago Everything Ara Eve Leo Sal 1x Everything encompasses the complete totality of existence , including all physical entities, forces, abstract concepts, and states of affairs that constitute reality . In philosophical metaphysics, it is often understood as the world in its entirety, where Ludwig Wittgenstein posited in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus that "The world is all that is the case" and "the world is the totality of facts, not of things," emphasizing that reality arises from the configuration of atomic facts rather than mere objects. [1] This view underscores a logical structure underlying all that exists, influencing subsequent analytic philosophy by framing everything as determinable through propositions that picture reality . [2] In the sciences, particularly physics, the concept of everything drives the pursuit of a theory of everything (TOE) , defined as an ultimate framework—a set of equations capable of describing all observed phenomena in nature, unifying the four fundamental forces ( gravity , electromagnetism , and the strong and weak nuclear forces) into a single coherent model. [3] This ambition traces back to efforts like Albert Einstein's unfinished quest for a unified field theory and has evolved through developments in quantum field theory and string theory , where candidates such as superstring theory propose extra dimensions and vibrating strings as the fundamental building blocks of all particles and interactions. [4] As of 2025, recent proposals such as new quantum gravity theories continue to advance the field, though no complete TOE has been verified, as reconciling general relativity with quantum mechanics remains a core challenge, highlighting the elusive nature of explaining everything within empirical constraints. [5] [6] Philosophically, discussions of everything extend to ontology , probing whether reality includes only concrete particulars or also universals, possible worlds, and necessary truths, as explored in modal metaphysics where everything might encompass modal realities beyond the actual universe . [7] These inquiries intersect with cosmology, where everything aligns with the observable universe 's estimated contents—approximately 10^{80} particles—and the multiverse hypothesis suggesting infinite variants, though such extensions remain speculative without direct evidence. [8] Ultimately, the notion of everything challenges human cognition, as complete knowledge may be inherently limited by observational and logical boundaries, yet it remains central to interdisciplinary efforts in understanding the fabric of being. Conceptual Foundations Definition and Scope "Everything" denotes the complete totality of all that exists, serving as the direct antithesis to nothing and encompassing every physical object , entity , form of energy , dimension of time and space , as well as abstract constructs such as mathematical numbers and conceptual ideas. [9] [10] This comprehensive inclusion extends to all observable and unobservable phenomena, forming an all-encompassing framework that leaves no aspect of reality excluded by definition. [11] In everyday language , the scope of "everything" frequently adopts an anthropocentric lens, centering on elements relevant to human perception , experience , and immediate surroundings, thereby limiting its breadth to what is practically accessible or meaningful from a human perspective. Conversely, technical discussions in philosophy and science employ an objective viewpoint, defining "everything" as the entirety of existence independent of human observation or comprehension, incorporating remote cosmic structures and theoretical entities alike. [9] Central to this totality is the universe , understood as the aggregate of all matter , energy, and governing physical laws within our observable reality. Hypotheses extending beyond this include multiverse models, such as bubble universes emerging from quantum fluctuations in eternal inflation , which posit an infinite array of disconnected realms with varying properties; however, these remain untestable through current empirical methods. [12] [13] While "universe" typically refers to the observable cosmos—bounded by the light-travel distance from the Big Bang—"everything" transcends this, potentially embracing infinite or unobservable expanses that challenge finite conceptions of reality. [13] Etymology and Linguistic Usage The term "everything" originated in Middle English around the late 13th century as a compound of "every" and "thing," functioning as an indefinite pronoun denoting the totality of items or entities. [14] The component "every" itself derives from Old English æfre ǣlc , a phrase meaning "ever each," which emphasized universality through intensification. [15] This univerbation process—merging "every thing" into a single word—reflected the language's shift toward more compact expressions during the transition from Old to Middle English. [16] The earliest attested use of "everything" appears in religious literature from the early 13th century , specifically around 1225 in the Middle English text Seinte Iuliene , where it denotes the comprehensive scope of divine creation and providence. [17] In medieval contexts, the word carried a literal sense of absolute totality, often invoked in theological discussions of God's dominion over all existence , as seen in sermons and devotional works emphasizing creation ex nihilo. [17] Across languages, "everything" finds equivalents that similarly convey universal inclusion, though with varying semantic nuances. In German, alles stems from Old High German al , implying "all" in a collective sense, often used in philosophical texts to denote wholeness. French employs tout , derived from Latin totus meaning "whole," which functions pronominally to express completeness, as in tout l'univers for "the entire universe." In non-Indo-European languages, Mandarin Chinese uses yīqiè (一切), combining yī ("one") and qiè ("cut" or "all"), evoking a sense of undivided universality and completeness in classical and modern usage. [18] Over time, the semantic usage of "everything" has shifted from strict literal totality in medieval writings to more flexible, often hyperbolic applications in contemporary English. This evolution allows it to denote not absolute all-encompassing reality but an exaggerated or comprehensive set within a context, such as in idiomatic expressions like "I know everything about it" implying thorough familiarity rather than omniscience . A notable cultural example is the " everything bagel ," a 20th-century American invention from around 1980 , where "everything" hyperbolically refers to a bagel topped with a mix of seeds, spices, and salt—combining remnants of various toppings rather than literally all possible ingredients. [19] This idiomatic extension highlights the word's adaptability in everyday language while retaining its core connotation of abundance. [17] Philosophical Explorations Historical Perspectives The concept of "everything" in ancient Greek philosophy emerged through inquiries into the nature of being and unity. Parmenides of Elea, active in the 5th century BCE, advanced a form of monism asserting that reality is a single, unchanging, and eternal being, where multiplicity and change are illusions of mortal perception. [20] His poem On Nature argues that "what is" must be whole and indivisible, rejecting non-being as inconceivable, thus positing all existence as one undifferentiated totality. [21] In contrast, Heraclitus of Ephesus, around the same period, emphasized flux within an underlying unity governed by the logos , a rational principle ordering the cosmos. He famously declared that "everything flows" ( panta rhei ), yet opposites coalesce into a harmonious whole, with all phenomena arising from and returning to this dynamic logos. [22] [23] Eastern philosophical traditions pre-dating the 20th century similarly explored "everything" as an all-encompassing ultimate reality. In Hinduism, the Upanishads (composed between 800 and 200 BCE) conceive of Brahman as the singular, infinite essence underlying the universe, transcending yet immanent in all forms of existence. Brahman is described as the unchanging reality ( sat ), pure consciousness ( cit ), and bliss ( ananda ), from which the manifold world emerges through illusion ( maya ), but to which the self ( atman ) ultimately returns in unity. [24] Taoism, articulated by Laozi in the 6th century BCE through the Tao Te Ching , presents the Tao as the ineffable way or path that generates and pervades everything without distinction. The Tao is the source of all things, operating through natural spontaneity ( ziran ), encompassing opposites like yin and yang in a balanced, eternal process that defies partial comprehension. [25] During the medieval period, Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century synthesized Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology, portraying God as the prime mover and uncaused cause of all creation. In works like the Summa Theologica , Aquinas argues that the chain of motion and causation in the universe requires an eternal, immaterial first principle — God —who sustains everything in existence as the source of being ( esse ). [26] This view integrates Aristotle's unmoved mover with divine transcendence, emphasizing God 's role in actualizing the potentiality of all things into a coherent totality. The Renaissance and early modern era saw Baruch Spinoza develop pantheism in the 17th century, identifying God or Nature ( Deus sive Natura ) as the singular substance comprising everything. In his Ethics , Spinoza posits that this infinite substance expresses itself through infinite attributes, with all particular things as modes thereof, rejecting any dualism between creator and creation. [27] In the Enlightenment, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's Monadology (1714) proposed monads as the fundamental, in